英国网民评俄罗斯发布93年来第一款新型坦克

编辑: 2015-05-29 774 次围观
Putin unveils first new Russian tank since1993 with most powerful gun ever as well as huge arsenal of most sophisticatedmilitary hardware 

普京发布1993年以来的第一款俄罗斯新坦克,拥有最强大的枪炮和大量高精尖武器装备 


The Russian Army has unveiled it's powerfulnew tank, set to go on display at the annual World War II memorial parade inMoscow this week. 

俄罗斯军队公布了新的强大坦克,本周将在年度莫斯科二战纪念阅兵上进行展示。 

The T-14 Armata, which is set to undergo trials next year, is the first newRussian tank since the T-90 was put in production in 1993. 

这款坦克于明年进行测试,这是自1993年T-90坦克投产以来俄罗斯的首款新坦克。 

The Moscow Victory Day Parade is held onMay 9th, and will this year commemorate the 70th anniversary of thecapitulation of Nazi Germany in 1945. 

莫斯科胜利日阅兵于5月9号举行,今年还将纪念纳粹德国1945年投降的70周年纪念日。 

Russian defense spending increased byone-third this year, and should reach £63.5billion by 2016. 

今年,俄罗斯的国防开销增长了三分之一,2016年可达到635亿美元。

评论翻译:

Slurpingticklepest,Sheffield, United Kingdom, 5 hours ago 
While at the same time the UK governmentcontinues to savagely cut its military spending to the bone... 

与此同时,英国政府正在不断的削减军队开支。 


Shadowlord01,Southport, 1 hour ago 
Considering we have a tank that has beenundefeated by any enemy (the only sole case of it being destroyed was byanother identical tank from our own side), I think that's doing pretty well. 

考虑到我们的某款坦克从来没有被敌人打败(唯一的一次还是被我们自己的另外一辆同样的坦克摧毁),我觉得已经很好了。 


KLonsdale, Oxford, United Kingdom, 5 hours ago 
Good. Now perhaps the US and EU will stopwasting our money provoking Russia by sticking their noses into its businessand trying to expand into that region. 

很好。现在美欧或许会停止浪费我们的钱财以干涉和扩张的方式来挑衅俄罗斯了。 


Thor,Valhalla, 1 hour ago 
>K Lonsdale, Oxford, United Kingdom, 3hours ago - "Why shouldn't Russia try to form an economic union ? Theydidn't try to interfere with the EU project. It's none of our business."... It IS our business when they invade other - independent - countries toFORCE them into their new empire. Maybe you're hoping they will invade ourcountry, as well, so you can enjoy the delights of living under a dictator?Make the most of your vote in the Election. If (when?) Putin's gang get here,you won't have the luxury of it any more. Whatever you think about the EU, nocountry has been forced to join it. 

"为什么俄罗斯不能构建一个经济联盟?他们并没有干涉欧盟的计划。我们根本管不着。" 
如果俄罗斯侵入其他独立国家要求他们加入俄罗斯建立的新帝国,那么我们就管得着。或许你也希望他们能入侵我们国家,这样你就可以快乐的生活在独裁统治之下?珍视你的投票权吧。如果普京真的入侵我们国家,你就根本无法享受到投票权了。而就欧盟而言,根本没有国家被强迫加入欧盟。 


AndySalter, Bournemouth, United Kingdom, 1 hour ago 
The UK and US are not sticking their nosesin any part of Russia. If a former Soviet country invites the USA into itsterritory and Russia doesn't like it then it is Russia who is sticking theirnoses in. Unless it's in Russia, Russia should shut up. 

英美根本就没有介入俄罗斯。如果一个前苏联国家邀请美国进入自己的领土,而俄罗斯不乐意的话,那么干涉别人的就是俄罗斯了。如果没有进入俄罗斯领土,俄罗斯就应该闭嘴。 


AntiEUSSR,Manchester, United Kingdom, 4 hours ago 
The turret is only 5mm bigger than the Challenger 2 & Abramstanks and wont have the same top secret armour (British designed) so I can'tsee them winning one on one. There was a Challenger 2 tank that broke down inIraq and the 'insurgents' fires RPGS, rockets etc for hours until they gothelp, they couldn't get through the armour it withstood everything 

这个炮塔只比挑战者2坦克和艾布拉姆斯坦克大5毫米,而且不具备同样顶尖的秘密装甲(英国设计),所以一对一的话我不觉得这种新坦克会赢。曾经有一架挑战者2号在伊拉克坏掉了,叛乱分子向这辆坦克发射了各种武器,几个小时的轰炸后,救援才到达,就是无法突破这种坦克的装甲,可以抵抗任何打击。 


mountaindweller,cleveland, 4 hours ago 
biggest test was their own friendly fireincidents which proved they couldn't penertrate the depleted uraniummesh-reinforced composite armor and one incident where they wanted to destroyone of their own with another tank in Iraq so it couldn't fall into enemyhands, they couldn't ? 

(回复楼上)最大的考验是他们自己的友军误伤事件,事实证明他们无法穿透这种贫铀网丝强化的复合材料装甲,在伊拉克就发生了一次这类型的友军误伤事件,所以绝对不能落入敌人的手中。 


rayweaver, baltimore, United States, 4 hours ago 
Don't count on them not having the armor 

这种新坦克的装甲肯定也不会差到哪里去的。 


publicX, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 4 hours ago 
The Russians have been using a 125mm main gun in their MBTs since 1964, sothis calibre is hardly new, whilst slight improvements to the gun may beevident, the biggest upgrade will be to the ammunition. 

自1964年以来,俄罗斯就开始在自己的主战坦克上使用125毫米主炮,所以这个口径没啥新鲜的,虽然主炮上的些许改进是显而易见的,但是最大的改进将在弹药上。 


madeiranlotuseater,Funchal, 4 hours ago 
There are more than two hundred Americanmilitary bases around the world, NATO has been trying to squeeze Russia foryears and the CIA love to engineer regime changes in countries that dont dowhat they want. I am sure that Russia would have been happier seeing itstrading growing around the world and not having to match the belicose posturingthat is the USA and its half trillion dollar a year military industrialcomplex. What do you expect Russia and China to do? Applaud? 

美国在全球有200多处军事基地,北约多年来一直在排挤俄罗斯,而中情局喜欢对不听话的国家进行政权改变。俄罗斯当然乐于见到自己的贸易在全世界增长,并且不想和好战的美国及其5000亿美元的军工企业对抗。你期望俄罗斯和中国怎么做?喝彩? 


Welshman,flint, 4 hours ago 
Looks like Germany's build up in the1930's. 

看起来像1930年代的德国军队建设啊。 


Mark,EUSSR, United Kingdom, 1 hour ago 
As the world gets more dangerous anduncertain Putin massively upgrades his armed forces while that idiot Cameronsells off and scraps ours! 

世界变得越来越危险和不稳定,所以普京在不断强化自己的武装力量,可愚蠢的卡梅伦却把我们的装备给贱卖了。 


Belltoller,Tampa, 24 minutes ago 
Take a break man. You have spent too longwatching war stories. The UK could never hope to field a defense to Russiaalone. That's why Britain has a nuclear deterrent. But that's all it has. Justa cheap option. 

得了吧。你看了太多战争故事了。英国从来都不期望单单靠自己的力量来抵御俄罗斯。所以英国才拥有核威慑力量。英国也就只拥有这个了。这是一种廉价的选择。 


Jamestown,Not applicable, United Kingdom, 4 hours ago 
The US Army's 8,700 M1 Abrams are completely battle tested tanks,which are so effective that not one has been taken out by enemy fire. Americaalso has a defence budget that far outstrips Russia's. Then there is all theother NATO countries firepower. 

美军的8700辆M1艾布拉姆斯主战坦克是完全经过战火洗礼的坦克,非常厉害,还没有一辆被敌人的火力消灭过。美国的国防开销也远超俄罗斯。还有北约其他国家的火力呢。 


Gerwulfthe Red, Valhalla, United Kingdom, 1 hour ago 
I must of been dreaming then when I walkedpast one that had taken out in Iraq then. 

美国的这种坦克在伊拉克就有被消灭过啊,我当时还从那辆被摧毁的坦克旁边走了过去呢,难道我是在做梦吗?
(五毛网编辑)转载http://wumaow.com